Please send submission inquiries to the Senior Editor for Online Publications, at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Volume 7, Number 1
Volume 6, Number 4
The First General Federal Vaccination Requirement: The OSHA Emergency Temporary Standard for COVID-19 Vaccinations
Article by Paul J. Larkin & Doug Badger
Administrative Inertia After Regents and Department of Commerce
Article by GianCarlo Canaparo
The Not-So Harmless Error Rule: How § 706 of the APA Could Be Applied in a More Effective Manner
Comment by Cannon Jurrens
Volume 6, Number 3
Improving the Legal and Regulatory Framework of Restraint and Seclusion in D.C. Public Schools
Comment by James Gallagher
Interagency Coordination on Labor Regulation
Article by Hiba Hafiz
Contracting for Algorithmic Accountability
Article by Cary Coglianese & Erik Lampmann
What's Hair Got to do With It? How School Hair Policies Violate the United States Constitution
Essay by Brianna D. Gaddy
Volume 6, Number 2
Regulation in the Biden Administration
Essay by Richard J. Pierce Jr.
A Preponderance of the Evidence: The Appropriate Standard in Title IX Sexual Harassment Proceedings
Comment by Caroline Edgar
Volume 6, Number 1
The Covid-19 Vaccine Dilemma
Article by Dorit Rubenstein Reiss
What is an Independent Agency to do? The Trump Administration's Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship and the Federal Trade Commission
Article by Joshua D. Wright & Alexander Krzepicki
The Problem with Foreign Investment: Using CFIUS & FIRRMA to Prevent Unauthorized Foreign Access to Intellectual Property
Comment by Soniya Shah, September 2, 2020
Volume 5, Number 4
It’s Just “Meat”: Traversing Lab-Grown Meat Labeling and Safety Regulations to Combat Food Scarcity and Climate Change
Article by Kevin Sforza, August 11, 2020
A Multilevel Marketing Company’s Battle to Survive an FTC Pyramid Scheme Action
Essay by Bonnie Patten, June 29, 2020
The (Regulatory) Force is With You: Using Early Aviation to Anticipate the Black Holes in the FAA’s Proposed Regulatory Changes for Commercial Human Space Flight
Comment by Sarah Knarzer, May 11, 2020
Volume 5, Number 3
Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Laws and Regulations With Criminal and Administrative Applications: An Argument Overlooked?
Article by Jonathan Marcus & Daniel B. O’Connell, March 23, 2020
Sipping the (Detox) Tea: The Rise in Advertisements for Non-FDA Approved Supplements on Social Media & Regulations (or Lack Thereof) That Govern
Comment by Vanessa G. Rijo, February 18, 2020
The Ascendancy of the Cost-Benefit State?
Article by Paul Noe & John D. Graham, January 15, 2020
Volume 5, Number 2
Book Review of “Reorganizing Government: A Functional and Dimensional Framework” (by Alejandro E. Camacho & Robert L. Glicksman)
Review by Joel A. Mintz, November 21, 2019
Out of the Hands of One: Toward Independence in Immigration Adjudication
Comment by Karen M. Sams, November 21, 2019
Indecent Disclosure: Has the Department of Justice Provided Sufficient Clarity to Incentivize Corporations to Admit Wrongdoing?
Comment by Madeleine DeGeorges, October 30, 2019
Volume 5, Number 1
Home Sweet Home: The Problem With Cost-Neutrality for Older Americans Seeking Home- and Community-Based Services
Comment by Sahar Takshi, July 8, 2019
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs: A Step Forward for Imported Food Safety?
Comment by Lizzy Rettinger, July 8, 2019
Volume 4, Number 2
Occupational Licensing and the Limits of Public Choice Theory
Essay by Ryan Nunn & Gabriel Scheffler, April 18, 2019
In a Justice Department Shutdown, Funded Agencies Can Still Litigate
Essay by Keith Bradley, April 11, 2019
Eliminating Ambiguity and Conflict: Protecting Transgender Inmates from Sexual Violence in Federal Prisons
Comment by Catherine Perrone, March 18, 2019
Volume 4, Number 1
How Should the U.S. Public Law System React to President Trump?
Essay by Richard J. Pierce, Jr., January 27, 2019
Arbitration Agreements and Nursing Homes: A Regulatory Compromise
Comment by Taylor Burnett, January 9, 2019
Volume 3, Number 2
Getting Your Cake But Not Eating It Too: The Effect of Net Neutrality Repeal on Broadband Infrastructure Deployment
Comment by Daniel Habif, September 27, 2018
Going Rogue: The National Telecommunications and Information Administration’s Transfer of the IANA Naming Functions to ICANN
Article by Nelson Drake, July 2, 2018
Twenty-Five Percent: U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s New Challenges in Increasing its Force
Comment by Arielle Chapnick, June 21, 2018
Volume 3, Number 1
What Congress’s Repeal Efforts Can Teach Us About Regulatory Reform
Article by Cary Coglianese & Gabriel Scheffler, December 31, 2017
A Response: What’s in a Nudge?
Responding to Cass R. Sunstein, Do People like Nudges?
Response by Brian Galle, October 20, 2017
Loyalty Through Unlawfulness: Standing up to the Department of Labor’s Fiduciary Rule
Comment by Joshua Couce, September 25, 2017
Volume 2, Number 2
The SEC’s Regulation Crowdfunding: The Issuer’s Dilemma
Comment by Laila Sabagh, May 7, 2017
Can the Government Deport Immigrants Using Information It Encouraged Them to Provide?
Article by Amanda Frost, January 24, 2017
Volume 2, Number 1
A Response: Sometimes Lost Opportunities Strengthen the Tax System
Response by Jeremiah Coder, December 29, 2016 (Responding to Karie Davis-Nozemack & Sarah J. Webber, Lost Opportunities: The Underuse of Tax Whistleblowers)
Social Media and Rulemaking in the Trump Administration
Article by Lynn White, December 22, 2016
Quantified Cost-Benefit Analysis at the SEC
Response by Joshua T. White, December 14, 2016 (Responding to Jeff Schwartz & Alexandrea Nelson, Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Conflict Minerals Rule)
Whose Best Interest? Why Michigan’s New Adoption Law is Unconstitutional and Prevents the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services from Helping Adoptable Children
Comment by James Hill, October 15, 2016
Holding Tight to the Reigns in Harnessing Industry Influence: A Comment on Professor Laurence Tai
Response by Wendy E. Wagner, July 15, 2016 (Responding to Laurence Tai, Harnessing Industry Influence)
Volume 1, Number 2
The State of Chevron: 15 Years After Mead On March 24, 2016, former Solicitor General Seth P. Waxman delivered the keynote address for the Administrative Law Review’s annual Symposium. His remarks examine the state of Chevron’s applicability fifteen years after Mead, and the consequences of emerging explicit skepticism.
A Reply: The Regulatory Budget Takes Form
Response by Sam Batkins (Responding to Jeffrey Rosen & Brian Callahan, The Regulatory Budget Revised)
Regulatory Accretion: Causes and Possible Remedies
Response by Sofie E. Miller & Susan E. Dudley (Responding to Reeve Bull, Building a Framework for Governance: Retrospective Review and Rulemaking Petitions)
A Response to Choosing a Court to Review the Executive
Response by William Funk (Responding to Joseph W. Mead & Nicholas A. Fromherz, Choosing a Court to Review the Executive)
Volume 1, Number 1
Securing Access to National Security Information
Response by Margaret B. Kwoka (Responding to Susan Nevelow Mart & Tom Ginsburg, [Dis-]informing the People’s Discretion: Judicial Deference Under the National Security Exemption of the Freedom of Information Act)
Bed Time for the Bed Mandate: A Call for Administrative Immigration Reform
Comment by Christina Elhaddad
A Fluid Situation: On the Role of Interstate Water Commissions in Fracking Policy
Comment by John A. Howes, Jr.
According To: Reeve Bull, Building a Framework for Governance: Retrospective Review and Rulemaking Petitions In this 2nd installment of the ALR Discussion Series, Reeve Bull, Research Chief at the Administrative Conference of the United States, discusses his Article, Building a Framework for Governance: Retrospective Review and Rulemaking Petitions, published in Volume 67, Issue 2 of the Administrative Law Review.
According To: Connor Raso, Agency Avoidance of Rulemaking Procedures On April 30th, 2015, ALR Accord premiered its first Discussion Series According to Connor Raso. The Discussion Series highlighted Connor’s article, Agency Avoidance of Rulemaking Procedures, published in Volume 67, Issue 1 of the Administrative Law Review.